Ask Dr. Johnson

Q: What is the legality in administering epinephrine to someone?

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Administering Epinepherine
Q: What is the legality in administering epinephrine to someone? Are WFA certified individuals allowed to carry epi-pens to have someone use if in an emergency situation or can epi-pens only be used if they are prescribed to someone?

Like many questions, the answers depends. States vary in what they consider to be legal. Some have specific provisions for lay providers. Others strictly forbid administering medication to non-family members. Most are not clear. I believe that this is a first aid skill. So do the American Heart Association and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. In Ontario, an Epi Pen can be purchased without a prescription. So where is the problem? It lies with the concept of the administration of a prescription medication by a non-licensed provider. Tens of thousands of people have been trained. I know that some of our graduates administer epinephrine each year. I am not aware of any bad outcomes, including adverse reactions or legal issues arising from administration of epinephrine by lay providers. Although many of us have written in defense of this procedure and organizations have lobbied on behalf of the training, a gray area still exists.

The most prudent approach when you are working for someone else would include the following:

  1. Training. – Keep your certification current.
  2. Authorization – Make sure that your employer knows about your level of training and has authorized you to administer the medication for any client should the need arise. Get your patient’s permission.
  3. Medication – Make sure that you have unexpired medication that is the correct concentration (if you are not using an autoinjector). It should be clear, colorless and free of any particulates. Your organization should supply the medication.
  4. Protocol/SOP – If you are using an organizational protocol (you should), make sure that it is current and approved. Review this at least yearly. In addition, there should be a regular accounting for the medication including the expiration date and disposal.
  5. Review – Anytime epinephrine is used (or should have been used), your employer should do a comprehensive review of the event, report back to the principles involved with the findings, and modify policy as needed based on this review.

If you administer epinephrine outside of a work setting, you still have the same responsibility to practice competently – current certification, unexpired medication, familiarity with your training protocol and patient permission.

In the relatively unusual likelihood it is medically necessary, epinephrine injection has proven to be an extremely low risk procedure for a significant benefit. I personally believe that the appropriate use of epinephrine for anaphylaxis is ethical and medically appropriate even where the legality might be questionable. Your employer should seek a legal opinion for your state. For more information on our view of the legal implications including the Good Samaritan legislation, a sample protocol or other articles on this or other topics, go to here.

Q: My son was diagnosed with mono

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Mono Recovery
“My son was diagnosed with mono last week. He is scheduled for philmon with the scouts on June 13. He is a 6’5 and swims high school & the YMCA teams. How do I know if he is OK to go on this.”

Assuming that you are referring to garden variety mono, caused by the Epstein-Barr virus, I suspect that you know that it is a very common viral illness. In fact, most of us will have contracted it by the end of our 3rd decade. Clinically, it can vary between minimal symptoms to a significant illness with total body implications that can make one feel miserable. Hospitalization is unusual. Not knowing your son or how sick he is/was, I will offer you some suggestions.

Given the potential activity at Camp, the major worry involves spleen enlargement that usually but does not inevitably occur with mono. The spleen is a blood filtering organ that resides under the L side of the diaphragm. When it enlarges, it emerges from the protective shield of the rib cage. This less protected location plus its more fragile transformation make it significantly more vulnerable to injury. If it breaks, potentially lethal internal bleeding can occur.

Most prudent practitioners warn against physical activities that could result in an injury to that area (e.g., contact sports, falls, heavy lifting) until it returns to its normal size, location and structural integrity. There is no hard and fast rule, but this prohibition should be in effect until the spleen can no longer be felt on examination. Have his health practitioner confirm this. A month for most people should be sufficient.

Otherwise, a person’s well being should be the rule. Most people are wiped out for a few weeks. Although recovery time is highly variable, most people are back to near-normal activity within 6 – 8 weeks.

Bottom line: Once the spleen has retreated to its normal spot, his personal well being is the most important factor. Just make sure that he does not do too much too soon. Quarantine is not an issue.

Q. Once a person has had an anaphylactic reaction to a substance

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Q: Once a person has had an anaphylactic reaction to a substance, will all subsequent exposures invariably lead to similar or worse reactions?

There is no question that recurrent reactions can follow re-exposure. As it turns out, however, the probability as reported in the medical literature is considerably less, about 50% for bee stings, for example. These re-exposure reactions can be less severe than the prior reaction.
Taking reasonable steps to avoid re-exposure is as important as being prepared to recognize and treat a reaction should it occur. For some people with recurrent severe reactions, immunotherapy (aka desensitization) can be a very effective deterrent. It is equally important to remember, however, that based on these statistics, not everyone needs to be treated following a re-exposure. Only treat those who develop signs and symptoms consistent with a true anaphylactic reaction.